AIM Framework glossary

Category Construction Corollary

Canonical definition

A corollary to the Relative-Position Computation Principle stating that because the agent-type categories over which the Observer's position computation runs are Heuristics maintained by the Thinker rather than fixed by the architecture, they depart from objective agent-boundaries in two directions: outward over-extension, in which the Thinker classifies non-agentive systems as agents, or a system that acts without wanting as a person, and runs the position computation against them (the wind as a god, the market as a bear or bull, an artificial intelligence as a person), and inward over-partition, in which the Thinker subdivides a single agent class into ranked sub-categories against which positional computation differentiates (racial hierarchy, caste stratification). Both forms arise without new architectural machinery: outward over-extension is the same computation applied to a Thinker-constructed agent representation; inward over-partition is the same computation applied to Thinker-maintained sub-categories within a class. The departure is carried by Contactless Updating, because the Individual seldom contacts the Referent that settles an agent-boundary and holds the categories on the testimony of those who share them, and where a sub-category acquires positional value the Mimetic Drive to False Belief maintains it as well. The corollary does not require that the departure produces stable error; in some environments, treating the wind as an agent may be instrumentally correct. It predicts that wherever the Thinker's categorical maintenance diverges from objective agent-boundaries, the Observer's positional computation will track the Thinker's categories rather than correcting for their accuracy, and that the divergence persists unless the Individual holds the Referent prior to the category.

Explanation

Since it is the thinking mind that decides what counts as an agent for the purposes of social comparison, that categorisation can slip in either direction. It can expand outward, treating things that are not really agents (the wind, the weather, the market), or a machine that acts but wants nothing (an artificial intelligence), as if they were persons one stands in relation to. And it can contract inward, splitting a single group of people into ranked sub-groups (by race, caste, clan), each of which becomes a distinct reference-class against which position is computed and maintained. In neither case does the architecture do anything new; the same position-tracking machinery that handles genuine rivals handles these extended or subdivided categories equally well. The slippage is a Thinker problem, not an Observer problem: the Observer computes faithfully against the categories it is given, and it is given whatever the Thinker has constructed. The categories shift with what people around us say rather than with how things are, and they stay wrong until the facts are put in charge of them.

Epistemic status

Framework-Specific Corollary.

Derivation

Chapter 10, Section 10.3.5.

Related terms