Scaling Asymmetry of Correct Hypotheses

Canonical definition

The architectural fact that a correctly-constructed systemic Hypothesis, once formed, faces a second and independent difficulty distinct from the difficulty of forming it, the difficulty of propagating it to others. Because Axiom 8's content-agnostic Belief-revision machinery processes the correct signal against listeners whose own priors have, independently and for the same update-rate reasons captured by the Configural Update-Rate Asymmetry, already converged on an agent-based explanation supplied by their own perception channels, the correct Hypothesis arrives at an already-decohered prior carrying a correspondingly high likelihood-ratio requirement. The resistance compounds across a population through the exchange of Evidence, as each listener's continued expression of the dominant agent-based explanation becomes further endogenous evidence reinforcing that explanation in everyone else. The asymmetry is resolved only by changing the listening population's priors through repeated exposure or by reducing the population's Coupling Strength, not by any further articulation effort on the Hypothesis-holder's part.