AIM Framework glossary
Symmetry of Crisis and Prevention
Canonical definition
The structural correspondence between the gain components of the Total Stability Condition and the five channels of the Knowledge Patch footprint. Formally: the five additive components of Gtotal (fast-layer effective loop gain Geff, slow-layer loop gain Gslow, higher-order cross-coupling remainder Gcross, network Evidence-coupling gain Gnet^K, and network Observability gain Gnet^Λ) are the gains through which crisis escalates, and the five Knowledge Patch channels act on them: the I-Override gate on Geff (and on Gnet^Λ through the Decision Hub weight β), AIM Vocabulary Acquisition on Gslow through the Restriction-Induced Concentration Factor, Epistemic Suspension on Gslow through the Evidence-Emission Coefficient, Patch-competent Evidence intake on Gnet^K, and Observability Governance on Gnet^Λ, so that each Patch channel is the converse of a gain through which crisis escalates. The symmetry is directional (not temporal), architectural (not moral), and cumulative (not substitutive). The Saddle-Node Default governs the temporal asymmetry between crisis and prevention dynamics. See, for the Total Stability Condition, Appendix A.5.7.4; for the five-channel Patch footprint, Appendix A.5.7.7; for the two-class intervention typology and its relationship to the five channels, Appendix A.5.1; for the Saddle-Node Default, Appendix A.5.3.
Explanation
The conditions that produce crisis and the conditions that enable prevention operate through the same five pathways. Each pathway that amplifies mimetic compounding toward the crisis threshold has a corresponding Knowledge Patch intervention that reduces it. Reducing all five is what Subcriticality Maintenance requires.
Epistemic status
Framework-Specific Construct.
Derivation
Also in the entry
Source: Appendix A.5.7.7; Chapter 13, Section 13.9.