AIM Framework glossary

Two-Logic Diagnostic

Canonical definition

A test for identifying Mimetic content in any interaction between two parties over a single Object. Where one party’s demand on the Object is bounded and correction-seeking, terminating on acquisition, and the second party’s demand on the same Object is positional, resetting with acquisition rather than terminating, the second demand is Mimetic by the Boundedness Asymmetry Principle, and every quantity the positional party captures above the recovery of its own input cost is Mimetic Premium. The diagnostic operates whether or not the interaction is a priced exchange and whether or not Money changes hands, because it turns on the termination structure of each party’s demand rather than on the form of the transaction. Derived in Chapter 12 from the time-bound asymmetry of the Appetitive and Intrinsic signals.

Explanation

When two people want the same thing, ask a simple question about each of them: does their wanting switch off once they get the thing, or does it just move up to the next rung? The person whose wanting switches off is trying to fix a real shortfall. The person whose wanting never switches off is really after position, being ahead, and that pursuit has no finish line. Anything that second person takes beyond simply covering what the thing cost them is the Mimetic Premium. This works for a shop sale, a service, a loan, or even a contest where no money changes hands at all.

Epistemic status

Framework-Specific Construct. Derived from Chapter 12 §12.17.1. Cross-references Boundedness Asymmetry Principle, Mimetic Premium, Object Parasitism, Source Opacity.

Derivation

Chapter 12, Section 12.17.1.

Related terms