AIM Framework glossary

Network-Layer Axiom Restatements (N1–N4)

Canonical definition

Network-Layer Axiom Restatements (N1, N2, N3, N4). Four derivative restatements, introduced in Appendix A, Section A.5.7.2, to specify the network layer of the three-layer formalism in the same way M1 through M5b specify the fast layer and B1 through B3 specify the slow layer. N1 through N3 restate Axioms 5, 7, and 8. N4 restates the finite energy budget of Chapter 4, Section 4.1. N1 Observability as Inter-Individual Channel (from Axiom 7 and the Observability Gradient): the exogenous input mobsi(t)m{obs}^{i}(t) at the population scale is a realised signal produced by the valuations and behaviours of other Individuals, weighted by the observability-gradient edge weight λij\lambda{ij}. N2 Evidence as Coupling-Mediated Input (from Axioms 5 and 8): coupling-mediated Evidence entering Individual ii is a function of the emitted Evidence propositions EtjEt^{j} of other Individuals jj, weighted by the interpersonal coupling strength κij\kappa{ij}. N3 Non-Commutativity Propagation (from the From-Wang-to-Mechanism derivation): intrapersonal non-commutativity of measurement contexts entails interpersonal coupling as a derived consequence, making path-dependence of Belief trajectories the expected regime at the network scale and the Hilbert-space formalism of Quantum Epistemology the natural language for the network-layer Belief Register. N4 Finite Intake Budgets (from the finite energy budget of Chapter 4, Section 4.1): an Individual's intake of other Individuals draws on two finite budgets. The Observer's intake is a perceptual-selection budget, and the Thinker's intake is a working-memory and deliberation capacity that also carries the I-Override. Both are spent out of the one energy envelope, which bounds them (Appendix A, Section A.5.7.2).

Explanation

N1 through N4 are not new axioms. They are restatements of the canonical axioms in the form required by the network layer of the dynamical system. N1 makes precise that the observability environment of any Individual is generated by other Individuals rather than entering as an exogenous primitive. N2 makes precise that social Evidence is weighted by the coupling matrix rather than being a flat input. N3 makes precise that the non-commutativity established for intrapersonal Belief updating in the From-Wang-to-Mechanism derivation propagates to the interpersonal scale once Individuals are coupled, justifying the Hilbert-space treatment of population-level Belief dynamics. N4 makes precise that intake of other Individuals is bounded by two finite capacities spent out of one envelope.

Epistemic status

Framework-Specific Axiom Restatement. Source: Appendix A.5.7.2.

Derivation

Appendix A, Section A.5.7.2.

Related terms